<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.research.microsoft.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results for 'app:forums' matching tag 'Future Releases'</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/search/SearchResults.aspx?q=app:forums&amp;tag=Future+Releases&amp;orTags=0&amp;o=DateDescending</link><description>Search results for 'app:forums' matching tag 'Future Releases'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>Re: Image Preview Pane</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/4750.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:4750</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your feedback on AutoCollage v. 1.1&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When designing layout of images, we thought of the design choices as structured or random. We though randomly placing the images would make the browsing pane look more interesting than a grid-style layout. A side-effect of this is that, since placement is random, sometimes there are clusters of images. Sometimes even when there&amp;#39;s only two images, they can cluster. As you discovered, one work-around to rearrange the images is to resize the image preview window.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both pure grid and random layout are relatively safe options from an implementation perspective.&amp;nbsp; Shooting for something in between, e.g. &amp;#39;random layout, but don&amp;#39;t overlap images unless there&amp;#39;s no more room&amp;#39; sounds easy, but like most simple-sounding solutions, the devil is in the details. Implementing this algorithm would require some additional time to develop, and significantly more time to test.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For version 1.1 we prioritized functional work such as allowing larger collages with more images, custom output sizes, and better Windows Live Photo Gallery integration. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you again for your feedback, we&amp;#39;ll make a note of it for any future releases.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Feature request: Larger Photo Collages</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/4741.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:4741</guid><dc:creator>gsmithferrier</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would like to be able to create larger photo collages. At present I am limited to 50 photos and 121.9 centimetres squared. Each year I manually create a photo collage of all of my photos for that year and hang it on the wall for us all to see. The size is 600cm * 800cm and usually includes just over 100 photos. AutoCollage is going to save me an absolutely huge amount of time but at present I will have to generate 10 separate collages (60cm * 80cm) and join them altogether. Obviously this still saves me a huge amount of time but the result isn&amp;#39;t what I want because it looks like 10 pictures all joined together. Could you increase the limits ?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks (and BTW AutoCollage is a superb tool).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guy&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Resolution of collage</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/3041.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:3041</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for using and purchasing AutoCollage, we appreciate your feedback!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Both of your suggestions are great ideas, we&amp;#39;ll pass them along to the product development team for consideration for any future releases of AutoCollage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your feedback!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Default &amp;quot;home&amp;quot; container</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2919.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2919</guid><dc:creator>bw_teach</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear Auto Collage Team,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Niiice Job!&amp;nbsp; What a &lt;u&gt;swee&lt;/u&gt;t application!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Request for ver 1.5....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An easier ability to set the default &amp;quot;open&amp;quot; folder (ie- a &amp;#39;tools/options&amp;#39;) setting to enable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;pre-positioning/staging photos as opposed to the current setup where AC2008&amp;nbsp;initiates&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;in the last known folder it compiled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A minor annoyance. THANKS AGAIN...SUPER APPLICATION!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Microsoft Research AutoCollage General evaluation feedback</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2916.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2916</guid><dc:creator>feedback_and_suggestions</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Dear&amp;nbsp;Developers and fellow Co-users, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have been searching for a long time for the result that&amp;nbsp;AutoCollage delivers, here are some general comments about my findings as a user and suggestions for future releases based on my own user experience&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although the functionality is limited to the core AutoCollage&amp;nbsp;function and no other variations, it is the collage effect I was looking for. It would be brilliant if the program could support more pictures than 25 but, I gather this is a balance of performance and stability during the early stages. Lets hope that this limitation can be&amp;nbsp;overcome in the future. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the manual face detection, there could be more related functionality such as resizing and repositioning the blocks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A&amp;nbsp;click and drag function to re order the auto collage layout would be useful. Clicking &amp;#39;create&amp;#39; delivers a different result every time so, a little more control over this and the possibility to move / off center an image would be great. For instance I generated a collage which was perfect except for the fact that there was a Giraffe in the collage that could have been better positioned.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All in all though, I am quite happy with the results and am likely to&amp;nbsp;buy the licensed version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best regards, Jonathan &lt;img src="http://community.research.microsoft.com/emoticons/emotion-21.gif" alt="Yes" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: AutoCollage API</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2786.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2786</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike -&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no published API for generating collages, and we have no announced plans to offer such an API in any potential future versions of AutoCollage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thank you for your question, sorry we don&amp;#39;t have a more encouraging answer!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Love this! Plus, suggestions</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2733.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2733</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;AutoCollage uses cutting-edge research to produce interesting collages. Like most image processing techniques, results aren&amp;#39;t perfect, and sometimes you will see collages which a human could make better. We tried to make it easy to automically create a new collage - which will hopefully look better - in these cases. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also, you can &lt;a class="" href="http://research.microsoft.com/autocollage/Help/UsingFaceDetection.htm"&gt;view and adjust face-detection results&lt;/a&gt; if you wish, which sometimes helps improve AutoCollage results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;re considering features for any potential future release of AutoCollage, but don&amp;#39;t have any specific details. We&amp;#39;ll make a note of your suggestion to enable &amp;#39;tweaking&amp;#39;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;thanks for your feedback!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Love this! Plus, suggestions</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2691.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2691</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We&amp;#39;re glad you&amp;#39;re enjoying the program! The collages look very nice, thanks for giving us a pointer to them. Also, we&amp;#39;ve added your suggestions to the list of features to consider for potential future release of AutoCollage. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for letting us know how you feel about AutoCollage, and for the suggestions!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Upgrades</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/2672.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:2672</guid><dc:creator>johnmil</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Having just released AutoCollage 1.0, we&amp;#39;re still very much involved in wrapping up details associated with this version. We haven&amp;#39;t announced any future releases, and so can&amp;#39;t say whether there will be AutoCollage upgrades in the future.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this changes, we&amp;#39;ll be sure to post information in this forum and on our blog. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your question!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>