<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://community.research.microsoft.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Image Composite Editor</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/112.aspx</link><description>This forum is to discuss bugs, issues, and suggestions for the Microsoft Image Composite Editor program.  Image Composite Editor is an advanced panoramic image stitcher. You shoot a set of overlapping photographs of a scene from a single location, and Image Composite Editor creates a high-resolution panorama incorporating all your images at full resolution.</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP1 (Build: 31106.3070)</generator><item><title>Re: Cannot specify rectilinear mapping</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6230.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 00:05:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:6230</guid><dc:creator>srothlis</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6230.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=112&amp;PostID=6230</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I understand, and I&amp;#39;ll adjust my expectations and workflow accordingly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two things that ICE does far, far better than any other stitching program out there: 1) it has a wonderfully intuitive and responsive way of interactively setting the horizon to ensure straight horizontals and verticals, and 2) it is insanely fast at blending very large images, along with a surprisingly tiny memory footprint. Blends that bog down with 2GB of RAM on other packages sail through with 200MB on ICE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those two things are so game-changing that I&amp;#39;d love to switch to ICE exclusively and never look back. The experience pushed my expectations way up, which colored my perception of the software&amp;#39;s shortcomings.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Cannot specify rectilinear mapping</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6227.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:6227</guid><dc:creator>mattu</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6227.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=112&amp;PostID=6227</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;This issue has been discussed a few times on the forum&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/p/2577/4076.aspx#4076"&gt;http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/p/2577/4076.aspx#4076&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/p/2229/3372.aspx#3372"&gt;http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/p/2229/3372.aspx#3372&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately ICE has a built in rule that images &amp;gt; than 140 degree field of view can&amp;#39;t be saved as perspective.&amp;nbsp; What you are hitting is this internal threshold so ICE reverts to equirectangular.&amp;nbsp; For your set of images I can&amp;#39;t think of an easy way to work around this limitation other than to re-shoot them to not include those portions that are cropped out in the PanoTools example.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While I very much appreciate the feedback of experienced pano photographers like yourself, I&amp;#39;m not sure that ICE is for you.&amp;nbsp; If you are an experienced PanoTools user then I think&amp;nbsp;it likely that you will&amp;nbsp;continue to be frustrated by the lack of advanced controls in ICE.&amp;nbsp; We intended this program as a quick and dirty stitching program for&amp;nbsp;simple stitching tasks.&amp;nbsp; It certainly isn&amp;#39;t meant to compete with more advanced tools like PTGUI or AutoPano.&amp;nbsp; That said I do think that it compares favorably to tools like Photoshop&amp;#39;s photomerge and other automatic solutions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item><item><title>Cannot specify rectilinear mapping</title><link>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6162.aspx</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:32:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">eaca9afb-5ccf-4c08-b3f3-369c7e6f1a06:6162</guid><dc:creator>srothlis</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><comments>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/thread/6162.aspx</comments><wfw:commentRss>http://community.research.microsoft.com/forums/commentrss.aspx?SectionID=112&amp;PostID=6162</wfw:commentRss><description>&lt;p&gt;I tried to put together a composite of my basement stairs. In this case ICE will only allow spherical or cylindrical mapping and the best it&amp;#39;ll do is this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/Stairs%202%20(ICE,%20spherical).jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" height="500" width="170" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I really want is rectilinear. PanoTools gives me the following image:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/Stairs%201%20(PTA,%20rectilinear).jpg" style="max-width:550px;border:0;" border="0" height="500" width="170" alt="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Personal opinions of aesthetics aside, as far as I&amp;#39;m concerned it&amp;#39;s a severe limitation that although ICE can calculate the rectilinear version (it will show a preview), it won&amp;#39;t generate the final result at all.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s a pity, because I find ICE very powerful, unbelievably fast and simplicity itself to use. But if it won&amp;#39;t generate the desired final image then it doesn&amp;#39;t matter how elegant the program is. It&amp;#39;s little more than a toy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FWIW, I&amp;#39;m running Vista 64 on Intel E8400 with 8GB RAM.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Component images: &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5381.jpg"&gt;image 1&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5382.jpg"&gt;image 2&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5383.jpg"&gt;image 3&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5397.jpg"&gt;image 4&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5398.jpg"&gt;image 5&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5399.jpg"&gt;image 6&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5414.jpg"&gt;image 7&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/IMG_5415.jpg"&gt;image 8&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ICE project file &lt;a href="http://stephen.rothlis.net/images/ice/stairs/Stairs%202.spj"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>